Resetting the California National Guard

Blogger’s Note:  With the Afghanistan drawdown, it’s practical for the Reserve Components to minimize their National Defense missions and assume larger roles in supporting civilian authorities emergency response to manmade and natural disasters.   The purpose of this article is to broaden the discussion of giving Reserve Components more National Defense missions within context of the National Guard’s state readiness mission, the true costs of Reserve Component deployments, and National priorities.  To provide an opposing view to Maj. Gen. David S. Baldwin’s and the National Guard Association of the United States’ (NGAUS) argument for increasing the Reserve Components’ combat power, I write about the following:  

  • Whether large Reserves of Combat Power are necessary for the  National Guard’s state mission;
  • Restructuring the Guard for its State Mission
  •  Reducing the number of Reserve Component deployments and possible savings;
  • How Reserve Component deployment costs shift from the  public to private sector;
  • Stretching the defense dollar by partnering with Civilian Employers;
  • Structuring the Active Duty Components to accomplish their missions; and 
  • Compensating for sequestration.

_________________________________________________

Military Transportation  capable  of  fording deep water and maneuvering over rugged ground  is a critical asset for civilian  authorities during emergencies. California  National Guard Photo (FLickr)
Military Transportation capable of fording deep water and maneuvering over rugged ground is a critical asset for civilian authorities during emergencies. California National Guard Photo (FLickr)

Large Reserves of Combat Power Unnecessary for State Missions

The National Guard  risks squandering its opportunity to  improve its readiness for civilian emergencies if it pursues more National Defense missions advocated by Major General David S. Baldwin in the October 2012 Congress Blog.

Keeping the National Guard at the forefront of our national defense, as Baldwin envisions, neither maximizes the taxpayer dollar nor inspires “responsible” leadership in the budgeting process.  In fact, it arguably  wastes taxpayer dollars by funding combat  units that are only partially used for state emergencies and that are, in essence, idle National Defense resources during non-deployments.

Baldwin criticizes a Defense Department proposal to reduce the number of Active Duty brigade combat teams (BCTs) from 45 to 30, while maintaining the current number of Reserve BCTs at 28.   Baldwin’s counter proposal is to reduce the Active Duty BCTs to 22, and increase  the Reserve Components BCTs to 52. It’s arguably more sensible for the Reserve Component  to have 22 BCTs (decrease  of six from the DoD proposal)  and for the Active Duty Component to have 36 (increase of six) where they are needed, have fulltime maintenance, and staged for National Defense missions.

Restructuring  for the  State Mission

Reserve Military Police (MPs) contain the security capabilities that California’s law enforcement community require for state emergency missions to include, but not  limited to: guarding collapsed buildings and structures; checkpoints;  convoys; guarding strategic reserves of medicines and food; and suppressing insurrections. For emergencies requiring security beyond the MPs capacities, a small strategic reserve of BCTs  and artillery units, minus the combat hardware, are sufficient for augmenting the MPs security missions.

The military assets that civilian authorities historically request during state emergencies are what the Army categorizes as Combat Support (CS) and Combat Service Support (CSS).  Among the capabilities in these categories are: military police; aviation; ground transportation; engineers; medical; communications; and logistical support.

Structuring the  Guard with CS/CSS-type assets places military resources at state levels where civilian  authorities can rapidly acquire and employ them during an emergency.   A National Guard structured  heavily with combat assets, on the other hand, risks potential shortfalls of the military resources civilian agencies will need during emergencies, compelling the state to request active duty CS/CSS assets at higher costs to the taxpayer.

Annual Actve-Duty Days per Ready Reseerve Member

Reduce Reservists Deployments in Wake of Iraq and Afghanistan Drawdowns

A 2004 Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report illustrates a trend that shows Reservists average 10 or fewer deployment days during “Non Deployed” periods. Reserve Component deployments steadily climbed in the late 90s during Bosnia and Kosovo deployments and gradually reached its zenith of  nearly a 75 day average for deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan following 9-11.

Assuming the Reserve Component deployment trends continuum were sustained from 2005 through 2013, civilian employers sacrificed approximately 29 percent of the work  year to military leaves of absence annually. Trimming these 75 deployment days from the DoD budget for the 354,000 Guardsmen currently serving nationwide, theoretically saves the taxpayer an estimated $6 billion annually while at the same time increases civilian employers’ productivity  in terms of military leaves  of absence they no longer subsidize.

It should be noted that Baldwin qualifies  his argument for  increasing the Reserve Components National Defense missions as a “striking bargain” for the taxpayer only during non-deployments saying, “that pay and operational  costs  are less than one-third the cost for an active duty soldier.” But this obviously contradicts  the  intent of  the National  Guard Bureau (NGB) Chief Gen. Frank J. Grass.  According to the October 2013 issue of the National Guard  magazine, Grass calls for overseas deployments of 5,000 to 10,000 Guardsmen annually in addition to funding their attendance at combat training centers. Perhaps the intent of the 2011 Budget Control Act , or sequestration,  is to identify expenses no longer applicable such as post Iraq/Afghanistan National Guard deployments and eliminate them from the budget.

90 percent of the Guard and Reserve are part-time. Nearly a quarter work for small business with 500 or fewer employees, and companies with more than 500 employees employ an additional 25% of all reservists.
90 percent of the Guard and Reserve are part-time. Nearly a quarter work for small business with 500 or fewer employees, and companies with more than 500 employees employ an additional 25% of all reservists.

Shifting Defense Costs to the Private Sector; State and Local Taxpayers

When combined with the same CBO study analyzing civilian employer profiles,  a picture emerges illustrating a 52% shift of National Defense costs from the public to private sectors.  The other 48%  of Reservists deployment costs are redistributed among  state and local taxpayers supporting agencies employing Reservists.

The CBO study breaks down as follows: 26% of all Reservists work for private firms with 500 or fewer employees; another 26% work for private firms with more than 500 employees; with the remaining 48% being self-employed, working for non-profit corporations, or for state, local and federal governments.

In California, this costs civilian employers of Guardsmen nearly $370 million annually. Extrapolating the CBO data onto California’s estimated 22,000 Army and Air Guardsmen reveals the following breakdowns: firms with 500 or fewer employees employ roughly 5,720 Guardsmen costing an estimated $96.1 million;  5,720 Guardsmen work for firms with more than 500 employees costing these firms nearly $96.1 million; and California’s local, state, federal government agencies, non-profit corporations, and self-employed Guardsmen collectively account for 10,560 citizen soldiers sacrificing an estimated $177.4 million in lost productivity, training temporary replacements, and other costs associated with military leaves of absences.

National Guard and Reserve trades are consistent with the Nation's needs for rebuilding the country's infrastructure, and California's needs for emergency response.
National Guard and Reserve trades are consistent with the Nation’s needs for rebuilding the country’s infrastructure, and California’s needs for emergency response.

Partnering with  Employers Strengthens Reserves:  Grows the Economy

President Barak Obama’s rebuilding America’s infrastructure initiative and the White House’s 2013 National Security Strategy (NSS) may hold a key for stretching DoD defense dollars.  The President calls for a “marriage of public and private investment” to rebuild America’s ragged roads, deteriorating bridges, and schools. The NSS directs the military to focus on “economic dynamism, a positive demographic growth pattern, and public/private partnering, or private-public partnerships (PPP), for investment in research and development.” Perhaps an opportunity exists within these directives for partnering  Reserve Components employers with private-public investors  for this infrastructure rebuilding.

The majority of Reservists work in transportation, construction and service industries, according to a 2004 CBO report. Suppose private-public investors were to give businesses employing experienced Reservists preference for infrastructure construction projects that the President advocates? Under  this scenario, employers conceivably receive a peace dividend, so to speak, for their nearly decade and a half of support in two ways: first, business contracts; second, training and schools Reservists are required to attend to maintain their military competencies, but for which employers don’t pay. Such ventures contribute toward powering economic  recovery in post Iraq/Afghanistan drawdowns.

Active Components Mission: Protecting the National and State Economies

A standing military force’s obligation to protect these economies takes on added significance when viewed through  the lens  of their worldwide missions.  The six Unified Combatant Commands, supported by three  functional commands, have geographic responsibilities in the Pacific, South America, Africa, Europe, Southwest Asia, and North America to protect National interests.  Funding these Commands requires a force structure beyond “a special forces” focus advocated in a Nov. 11, 2013 Sacramento Bee Opinion recommending drastic overhaul of military force  structure–an opinion that coincidently resembles the OP-ED  Baldwin authored in the Congress Blog.

These are some of the threats of which the Active Duty Component must be aware and prepared to deter. China seeks to dominate airspace centered around the Diaoyu/Senkaku islands, a chokepoint for controlling the flow of oil, mineral, and fishing rights in surrounding waters; posing a threat to South Korea and Japan, two of America’s major trading partners. Russia continues to rattle its sabers in support of countries in Africa  with the potential of military conflict on the resource-rich continent. The United States, Russia, and all former colonial powers with a footprint on the continent seek influence because of its potential economic impact on world economies.

Active Duty Commanders should have enough force structure to accomplish their missions  and to protect land, sea, and air lines  of communication that support international commerce vital to the Nation’s economy.  Giving the National Guard and Reserves increasing roles in these National Defense missions not only extracts resources from our state and national economies at home, but also thins the Active Duty ability to protect our National Interests abroad.

Compensating for Sequestration

Congress establishes a spending cap with sequestration, but does not mandate the dramatic massive budget cuts naysayers are portending in the media. The challenge facing the Pentagon and the National Guard lies not in the drama of drastically restructuring the military forces or competing for a budget  appropriations, but economizing its budgets to accomplish their missions.  Part of the solution may be trimming unnecessary costs such as Reservists post Afghanistan draw down deployments. Another partial solution may rest with creative management and innovative relationships with private-public partnerships.

Baldwin’s argument for dicing up the defense dollar is tantamount to playing a shell game with military appropriations.  His attempts to manipulate Congressional and public opinion to influence decision makers to allocate more  funding under the National Guard shell is not in tune with the welfare of the Guard’s rank and file, nation, or state.  When the  Nation’s national defense and economic interests are at stake, it’s not worth the gamble of a shell game.

55 comments

  1. Some good points – I am especially concerned about the impact on the civilian employers of Reserve and National Guard members. How long will they be willing to hire Reserve and National Guard members if they know they will be gone for several months each year?

    Like

    1. Good comments. I would think it’s incumbent upon NGB and senior leaders to keep a finger on the part-timers pulse, so to speak, to gage how long they can maintain the deployment pace after a decade and a half of deployments. Nothing wrong with restructuring for the state mission with fewer deployments. It doesn’t make Reservists any less of a soldier or professional. With approximately 90 percent of the force working part-time, it’s easy for the 10 percent full time force to lose sight of fact that the part-time soldier’s civilian employment also serves an important function to the economy.

      Like

  2. ZezoDad: first and foremost I am compelled to take this opportunity to thank all CNG staff for their dedication, sacrifices and unselfish service to the people of this great nation! God speed each and every one of them a safe and expeditious journey home to their families and loved ones.

    I fully agree and support your position on the need for the NGB to minimize the amount of National Defense Missions and assume larger roles in supporting civilian authorities prior to and during emergencies and disasters that threaten lives and infrastructure. CNG has played an increasing role in the emergency/disaster realm since the 1986 floods in Northern California, and provided key resource support during California’s large scale wildland fires, earthquakes and NorCal floods. Not only must CNG engage more in assisting civilian authorities in the Golden State but all other States NG Departments need to do the same, especially with the existence of the EMAC, Title 10 and Title 32 directives, The cost benefit ratios from NG support to Katrina and New Jersey provide justification for such roles.

    As time moves forward I anticipate an increasing loss of dedicated, knowledgeable and experienced emergency responders and managers. Unfortunately, emergency management has become both politicized and populated by administrators, mostly at the state and federal levels, and emergency managers at the local and county levels have been “short sheeted” and are left in a quandry. Protecting lives and infrastructure, as many of your readers know, is not a game and can’t be legislated and certainly requires knowledgeable, experienced, mission oriented and capable people to lead and make appropriate decisions under duress.

    Thank you for bringing attention to the matter of the NGB/CNG need to mission refocus.

    Like

  3. Greetings from Ohio! I’m bored to tears at work so I decided to check out your blog on my iphone during lunch break.

    I really like the information you present here and can’t wait to take a look when I get home.
    I’m surprised at how fast your blog loaded on my phone ..

    I’m not even using WIFI, just 3G .. Anyhow, amazing blog!

    Like

  4. Excellent post. I was checking continuously this blog and I
    am impressed! Very useful information particularly the last part
    🙂 I care for such info a lot. I was looking
    for this particular information for a long time.

    Thank you and good luck.

    Like

  5. Hello There. I found your blog using msn. This is an extremely well written article.

    I will be sure to bookmark it and come back to read more of your
    useful information. Thanks for the post.

    I’ll certainly return.

    Like

  6. Thanks on your marvelous posting! I truly enjoyed reading it, you could be a great author.
    I will make sure to bookmark your blog and may come back in the foreseeable future.
    I want to encourage you continue your great work, have a nice evening!

    Like

  7. Greate post. Keep posting such kind of information on your blog.

    Im really impressed by your site.
    Hello there, You’ve done a fantastic job. I will certainly digg it and
    in my opinion recommend to my friends. I’m sure they’ll be benefited
    from this web site.

    Like

  8. This is the right blog for anyone who really wants to find out about this topic.

    You understand so much its almost tough to argue with you (not
    that I personally will need to…HaHa). You certainly put a fresh spin on a subject which has been discussed for decades.
    Great stuff, just wonderful!

    Like

  9. We are a bunch of volunteers and opening a brand new scheme
    in our community. Your website offered us with valuable info to work on.
    You have performed an impressive job and our entire group will
    be thankful to you.

    Like

  10. I must thank you for the efforts you have put in penning this site.
    I’m hoping to check out the same high-grade content from you in the future as well.
    In truth, your creative writing abilities has inspired me to get my
    own blog now 😉

    Like

  11. Just wish to say your article is as astounding.
    The clearness in your submit is simply nice and that i can think you’re an expert in this subject.
    Well with your permission allow me to snatch your RSS feed to stay
    up to date with forthcoming post. Thank you a million and please
    keep up the rewarding work.

    Like

  12. Howdy! This post could not be written any better! Looking
    at this post reminds me of my previous roommate! He continually kept talking
    about this. I’ll send this post to him. Pretty sure he
    will have a very good read. Many thanks for sharing!

    Like

  13. Do you mind if I quote a couple of your posts as long as I provide credit and sources back
    to your site? My website is in the exact same area of interest as yours
    and my users would truly benefit from some of the information you provide here.
    Please let me know if this okay with you. Many thanks!

    Like

  14. Thanks for every other informative website. Where else
    could I get that type of info written in such a perfect manner?
    I’ve a undertaking that I’m simply now running on, and I have been on the glance out
    for such info.

    Like

  15. Appreciating tɦe time and effort ʏou put intߋ youг site and etailed іnformation you present.
    It’ѕ awesome tо ϲome aсross а blog everʏ once in a wɦile tҺаt
    isn’t the ѕame outdated rehashed іnformation. Fantastic гead!
    I’ve saved ƴߋur site and I’m adding ʏour RSS feeds
    to mү Google account.

    Like

  16. Nice post. I was checking constantly this blog and I’m impressed!

    Extremely useful information particularly the last part
    🙂 I care for such info much. I was looking for this particular information for a long time.

    Thank you and best of luck.

    Like

  17. Simply wish to say your article is as astounding. The clearness in your publish
    is simply great and that i could think you’re an expert in this subject.
    Fine with your permission let me to clutch your feed to stay
    up to date with imminent post. Thank you 1,000,000 and please carry on the rewarding work.

    Like

  18. Hellο there Ӏ am so delighted Ӏ fpund your webpage, I rеally fоund you by mistake,
    while Ӏ was browsing on Google fоr somеthіng
    elѕe, Anyhoow I am hеre now and wߋuld juѕt liƙe to say many thankѕ fοr a marvelous
    post ɑnd a ɑll round enjoyable blog (I alsߋ love tthe theme/design), І don’t ɦave timе to browse іt all at thе momеnt
    bսt I havе bookmarked it and alѕo adɗеd in уoսr RSS
    feeds, ѕo wɦеn I hаve time I wіll Ƅe Ƅack to read a ǥreat deal moгe, Pleаse do
    kеep up tɦе awesome ѡork.

    Like

  19. You could certainly see your expertise within the article you write.

    The sector hopes for more passionate writers such as you who aren’t afraid to say how they believe.

    Always go after your heart.

    Like

  20. Heya i am for the first time here. I came across this board and I find It truly useful & it helped me out a lot.
    I hope to give something back and aid others like you helped me.

    Like

  21. I think this is among the most vital information for me.
    And i am glad reading your article. But wanna remark on some general
    things, The web site style is great, the articles is really nice :
    D. Good job, cheers

    Like

  22. Thanks on your marvelous posting! I truly enjoyed reading it, you are a great author.I will remember to
    bookmark your blog and will eventually come back from now on. I want to encourage one to continue your great work, have a nice holiday weekend!

    Like

  23. Thanks for a marvelous posting! I genuinely enjoyed reading it, you will be a great author.I will
    be sure to bookmark your blog and will often come back in the future.
    I want to encourage you to definitely continue
    your great writing, have a nice holiday weekend!

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.